I loved to watch Ben Wallace once.
Yet, now, I don’t think Big Ben could find one fan even in the Chicago area…heck, even in the front office of the team who owes him $28.5 million over the next two seasons.
The notion that Ben Wallace is untradeable doesn’t come from the unwillingness to get rid of him on the Bulls’ part. Actually, the Bulls would love to dump Wallace and everything in his locker on the United Center's cold entrance before the next home game (making for some potentially nice memorabilia for fans).
Wallace's "untradeability" comes from chiefly two factors: 1) His super HUGE contract, and 2) His basketball skills are no longer magical.
Yes, Ben Wallace has long fallen past “ordinary;” his game is now “upchuckable.”
Chicago Tribune’s Sam Smith opined about Joakim Noah already taking over for Wallace, something the Bulls front office didn’t expect until next season at the earliest.
Yet, with all the negatives about The Body, would it be possible for the Bulls to get rid of this stray cat? Or would they end up screwing themselves even further in doing so?
Smith’s got a plan...involving who? Oh, everybody’s favorite prognostication plaything: the Lakers!
Wallace makes sense for the Lakers with Andrew Bynum's injury, and they can give the Bulls enough to make sense of a deal.As Chicago native, I like this scenario because it rids Chicago of Ben Wallace. You could give me sardines for The Body. Vlad’s deal is quite long, but every team can use another white-Euro-big-man-shooter-when-healthy.
You take Kwame Brown's expiring contact of $9 million and add Vladimir Radmanovic at $5.6 million and it's a deal. The Bulls wouldn't want to take on Radmanovic's deal, which goes through 2010-11, but it's much cheaper than Wallace and may be the best way to get out from under his deal.
I'm sure this deal "makes no sense" for the Lakers who only need a big for eight weeks until Bynum's return. However, if they're really looking for a chip this season, The Body could be that experienced vet you're going to need.
But most likely not.


